4.7 Review

Role of glycolysis in inflammatory bowel disease and its associated colorectal cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1242991

关键词

glycolysis; colorectal cancer; inflammatory bowel disease; immunity; intestinal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) share a common factor in their development, glycolysis, which affects various aspects of gastrointestinal tissues. In IBD, glycolysis impacts the intestinal microbiota, mucosal barrier function, and the immune system, while in CRC, it is linked to multiple signaling pathways and transcription factors. A comprehensive study of glycolysis is crucial for a better understanding of the pathogenesis and therapeutic targets of both IBD and CRC.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been referred to as the green cancer, and its progression to colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant challenge for the medical community. A common factor in their development is glycolysis, a crucial metabolic mechanism of living organisms, which is also involved in other diseases. In IBD, glycolysis affects gastrointestinal components such as the intestinal microbiota, mucosal barrier function, and the immune system, including macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, and neutrophils, while in CRC, it is linked to various pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and transcription factors such as p53, Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), and c-Myc. Thus, a comprehensive study of glycolysis is essential for a better understanding of the pathogenesis and therapeutic targets of both IBD and CRC. This paper reviews the role of glycolysis in diseases, particularly IBD and CRC, via its effects on the intestinal microbiota, immunity, barrier integrity, signaling pathways, transcription factors and some therapeutic strategies targeting glycolytic enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据