4.6 Review

Immune regulation in gastric adenocarcinoma is linked with therapeutic efficacy and improved recovery

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1238248

关键词

adenocarcinomas; diagnosis; gastric cancer; biomarker; therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenocarcinomas are a common type of gastric cancer with high mortality rate due to its silent progression, genetic heterogeneity, high resistance to chemotherapy, and lack of highly effective therapeutic strategies. Although multiple treatment options such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy have been developed, further advancements are needed. Targeting different check points and key immune players, especially macrophages and related molecular elements, can help in developing novel therapeutic options.
Adenocarcinomas are one of the most common histological types of gastric cancer. It has been ranked fifth among common cancers and is the third among death causing cancers worldwide. The high mortality rate among patients with gastric cancer is because of its silent evolution, genetic heterogeneity, high resistance to chemotherapy as well as unavailability of highly effective therapeutic strategy. Until now a number of several treatment strategies have been developed and are being practiced such as surgery, chemotherapy, radio therapy, and immunotherapy, however, further developments are required to improve the treatment responses and reduce the side effects. Therefore, novel personal therapeutic strategies based on immunological responses should be developed by targeting different check points and key immune players. Targeting macrophages and related molecular elements can be useful to achieve these goals. In this minireview, we discuss the available treatment options, molecular underpinnings and immunological regulations associated with gastric adenocarcinoma. We further describe the possible check points and immunological targets that can be used to develop novel therapeutic options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据