4.6 Review

Structure and function of molecular machines involved in deadenylation-dependent 5′-3′ mRNA degradation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1233842

关键词

RNA; poly(A); gene expression; RNA degradation pathway; RNA decay; nuclease; deadenylase complex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotic cells, the synthesis, processing, and degradation of mRNA are important for accurate gene expression. The presence of a cap structure and poly(A) tail in mature mRNA promotes translation and prevents degradation. Degradation through the deadenylation-dependent 5'-3' pathway is induced by trans-acting factors, which recruit the core mRNA degradation machinery to shorten the poly(A) tail, remove the cap structure, and degrade the mRNA body.
In eukaryotic cells, the synthesis, processing, and degradation of mRNA are important processes required for the accurate execution of gene expression programmes. Fully processed cytoplasmic mRNA is characterised by the presence of a 5 ' cap structure and 3 ' poly(A) tail. These elements promote translation and prevent non-specific degradation. Degradation via the deadenylation-dependent 5 '-3 ' degradation pathway can be induced by trans-acting factors binding the mRNA, such as RNA-binding proteins recognising sequence elements and the miRNA-induced repression complex. These factors recruit the core mRNA degradation machinery that carries out the following steps: i) shortening of the poly(A) tail by the Ccr4-Not and Pan2-Pan3 poly (A)-specific nucleases (deadenylases); ii) removal of the 5 ' cap structure by the Dcp1-Dcp2 decapping complex that is recruited by the Lsm1-7-Pat1 complex; and iii) degradation of the mRNA body by the 5 '-3 ' exoribonuclease Xrn1. In this review, the biochemical function of the nucleases and accessory proteins involved in deadenylation-dependent mRNA degradation will be reviewed with a particular focus on structural aspects of the proteins and enzymes involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据