4.6 Review

The effect of synthesis conditions and process parameters on aerogel properties

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1294520

关键词

aerogel; supercritical; sol-gel; aging; solvent exchange; silica; carbon; polysaccharide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerogels are unique nanoporous materials with properties such as low density, high porosity, high specific surface area, and interconnected pore networks, making them suitable for various applications including adsorption, thermal insulation, catalysts, tissue engineering, and drug delivery. The physical and chemical properties, as well as pore structure of aerogels, are crucial in determining their application areas, and can be tailored to meet specific requirements for each application. Furthermore, the synthesis conditions and process parameters for tailoring aerogel properties, from precursor dissolution to supercritical drying, have been investigated in the literature.
Aerogels are remarkable nanoporous materials with unique properties such as low density, high porosity, high specific surface area, and interconnected pore networks. In addition, their ability to be synthesized from various precursors such as inorganics, organics, or hybrid, and the tunability of their properties make them very attractive for many applications such as adsorption, thermal insulation, catalysts, tissue engineering, and drug delivery. The physical and chemical properties and pore structure of aerogels are crucial in determining their application areas. Moreover, it is possible to tailor the aerogel properties to meet the specific requirements of each application. This review presents a comprehensive review of synthesis conditions and process parameters in tailoring aerogel properties. The effective parameters from the dissolution of the precursor step to the supercritical drying step, including the carbonization process for carbon aerogels, are investigated from the studies reported in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据