4.8 Article

TBOMC: A Task-Block-Based Overlapping Matching-Coalition Scheme for Task Offloading in Vehicular Fog Computing

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 15209-15222

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3265194

关键词

Coalition formation; cooperative computing; incentive mechanism; matching theory; overlapping; vehicular fog computing (VFC); vehicular network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a novel task-block-based offloading paradigm for vehicular fog computing, which reduces computation latency and solves the complex offloading problem through the overlapping matching coalition scheme.
Vehicular fog computing (VFC) is regarded as a promising framework for vehicular computing applications by utilizing local spare resources of nearby vehicles to conduct ubiquitous time-critical and data-intensive tasks. Meanwhile, how to provide stable and low-latency services through real-time task offloading has become a heated issue. Opposite to the traditional task-to-individual offloading manner, in this article, we propose a novel task-block (TB)-based offloading paradigm for VFC, in which the tasks are merged into blocks to be assigned and offloaded. This TB-based offloading paradigm effectively alleviates the offloading decision-making burden and, thus, reduces the overall computation latency in the dynamic vehicular environment. Faced with transmission-reliable and time-intensive requirements of TBs, we turn to cooperation among vehicles and further propose a TB-based overlapping matching-coalition (TBOMC) scheme integrating overlapping coalition formation (OCF) game with matching theory to address the complicated offloading problem. The OCF game framework encourages vehicular fog nodes to devote their resources and form collaborative computing groups in a distributed method. Numerical results demonstrate that the TBOMC scheme better exploits local computing capabilities and outperforms from 5% to 12% over other existing benchmarks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据