4.8 Article

FedAB: Truthful Federated Learning With Auction-Based Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 15159-15170

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3264677

关键词

Federated learning (FL); game theory; incentive mechanism; multi-armed bandits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we propose FedAB, an incentive and client selection strategy for federated learning, which ensures the effectiveness, fairness, and reciprocity of data contribution while preserving user privacy. Extensive experiments on real datasets demonstrate the superiority of FedAB in terms of total reward, final accuracy, and convergence speed compared to state-of-the-art solutions.
Federated learning (FL) emerges as a new distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm that enables thousands of mobile devices to collaboratively train ML models using local data without compromising user privacy. However, the FL learning quality highly relies on the data contribution from the distributed mobile devices. Therefore, a well-designed incentive mechanism with effectiveness, fairness, and reciprocity is in urgent need to guarantee the stable participation of users. In this article, we propose federated auction bandit (FedAB), an incentive and client selection strategy based on a novel multiattribute reverse auction mechanism and a combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) algorithm. First, we develop a local contribution evaluation method based on importance sampling in the FL context. We then design a novel payment mechanism that is able to preserve individual rationality and incentive compatibility (truthfulness). At last, we design a UCB-based winner selection algorithm that is proven to achieve the server's utility maximization with fairness and reciprocity. We have conducted extensive experiments on real data sets. The results demonstrate the superiority of FedAB, with a 10%-50% improvement in total reward, final accuracy, and convergence speed compared to state-of-the-art solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据