4.6 Article

The augmented and integrative model of economic growth: Theoretical and empirical evidence from USA

期刊

SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101673

关键词

Economic growth; Physical capital; Human capital; Technological progress; Employment; Unemployment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a hybrid and integrated theoretical model to understand the relationship between education and economic growth. The research focuses on the variables of human capital and labor, and their impact on unemployment and economic growth. The results reveal different statistical significance in the short and long term, emphasizing the importance of technological progress, physical capital, and human capital in explaining economic growth.
The current nexus between education and economic growth leads us to propose a hybrid and integrated theoretical model. The variables chosen for this research were human capital and labour, and their impact on unemployment and economic growth was considered. In the validation of the theoretical model, different equations were contemplated, and the ARDL co-integration technique for its estimation was chosen. This study emphasizes the importance of technological progress, physical capital and human capital; the latter is measured by educational training and its interactive effect on employment and unemployment in explaining the behaviour of economic growth in the US from 1981 to 2019. The results show different statistical significance in the short and long term. These results corroborate the premise that there are partial adjustments in the short term, particularly after an economic crisis. In the long term, economic growth is affected by the positive or negative magnitudes of the product elasticity for each of the drivers considered. In terms of policy implications, a combination of structural and demand-driven policies must be implemented to reduce unemployment, in particular, to halt protracted economic recessions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据