4.6 Article

COVID-19 crisis and the efficiency of Indian banks: Have they weathered the storm?

期刊

SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101661

关键词

Bank efficiency; COVID-19 pandemic; Two-stage network model; Directional distance function; Data envelopment analysis; Indian banks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to determine the resilience of Indian banks to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a two-stage directional distance function-based network data envelopment analysis (DDF-NDEA) approach, the study examines the banks' deposits-generating and operating efficiencies and compares them before, during, and after the pandemic. The findings suggest that the Indian banking system showed resilience to the immediate impact of COVID-19, although large and medium-sized banks experienced some efficiency losses. Overall, banks, regardless of ownership and size, demonstrated resilience and improved efficiency in response to the global health crisis.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Indian banks were able to weather the COVID-19 storm. We estimate banks' deposits-generating and operating efficiencies using a two-stage directional distance functionbased network data envelopment analysis (DDF-NDEA) approach and seek to capture the immediate impact of COVID-19 on these efficiency measures by comparing their magnitudes in the pre-pandemic (2014/15-2019/ 20), just 1-year prior to the pandemic (2019/20), and during the pandemic year (2020/21) periods. The study looks at whether the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was uniform across ownership types and size classes. The empirical findings suggest that the Indian banking system was resilient and withstood the immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the study period, however, the large and medium-sized banks experienced some efficiency losses. By and large, regardless of bank group, banks have shown resilience to the shock of the global health pandemic and improvements in efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据