4.6 Article

Simulation analysis and experimental study on aramid fiber reinforced polymer micro-milling mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 431-443

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.033

关键词

Aramid fiber reinforced polymer; Micro -milling; Simulation analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying the motion law of micro-milling cutter teeth and conducting simulation analysis and experiments, this study established the equation of cutting path and derived the functional relationship between feed speed and cutting force. The results showed the optimal feed speed for aramid fiber reinforced polymer micro-milling and verified the power function relationship between feed speed and horizontal cutting force.
By studying the motion law of micro-milling cutter teeth, the equation of cutting path was established, the power function relationship between feed speed and horizontal cutting force was derived, and there is critical feed speed, which generates critical cutting force and causes cutter fracture. The aramid fiber reinforced polymer micro-milling simulation analysis was carried out based on Hashin failure criterion in ABAQUS software, and the functional relationship between feed speed and cutting force was verified and solved. The aramid fiber reinforced polymer micro-milling experiments show that at a feed speed of 50 mm/min, there were fewer fiber burrs on the entrance and the section, but more resin powders on the section and lower efficiency. When the feed speed is increased to 700 mm/min, the quality of entrance and section decreases, the feed effect of tool is greater than that of rotation, and the resultant force of horizontal cutting increases to 41.221 N. The power function rela-tionship between feed speed and horizontal cutting force was verified by experiment, with a coefficient of 1.489 and an index of 0.498. The average error of simulation analysis and experiment was 2.062 %, while the error between theoretical value of critical cutting force and experiment was only 5.766 %, with high accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据