4.6 Article

Surface morphology in high-speed grinding of TMCs fabricated by selective laser melting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 200-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.064

关键词

Titanium matrix composites; Selective laser melting; Grinding; Surface morphology; Fractal dimension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the surface morphology in high-speed grinding of TiC-reinforced titanium matrix composites (TMCs) fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM). Two surface features, smearing at low grinding speeds and scratch at high grinding speeds, are found in the ground surface of TMCs. The correlations between fractal dimension (FD) and surface roughness (Ra) indicate the ground surface formation mechanisms of TMCs. The results show that submicron TiC generated in SLM cooperating with high grinding speed achieves a good surface quality in terms of reduced surface roughness and subsurface damages for TMCs, which could be beneficial to the fabrication of other metal matrix composites.
TiC-reinforced titanium matrix composites (TMCs) are typically difficult-to-machine materials. It is prospective to combine the advantages of selective laser melting (SLM) and high-speed grinding to manufacture TMCs parts. This study investigates the surface morphology in high-speed grinding of TMCs fabricated by SLM. Grinding experiments with 28.75-232.66 m/s are conducted. Two surface features are found in the ground surface of TMCs, i.e. smearing at low grinding speeds and scratch at high grinding speeds. Surface morphologies are evaluated based on fractal dimension FD and surface roughness Ra. The results show that the correlations between FD and Ra indicate the ground surface formation mechanisms of TMCs. It is found that submicron TiC generated in SLM cooperating with high grinding speed achieves a good surface quality in terms of reduced surface roughness and subsurface damages for TMCs, which could be beneficial to the fabrication of other metal matrix composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据