4.5 Article

An Intelligent UAV Path-Planning Method Based on the Theory of the Three-Dimensional Subdivision of Earth Space

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi12100397

关键词

deep reinforcement learning; UAV path planning; GeoSOT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid development of the big data era, the adoption of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in various complex environments is increasing, posing new challenges for UAV path planning. This paper proposes a novel environment-modeling approach based on airspace grids to efficiently organize, manage, and express data in complex scenes and intelligently carry out fast and efficient path planning for UAVs.
With the rapid development of the big data era, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are being increasingly adopted for various complex environments. This has imposed new requirements for UAV path planning. How to efficiently organize, manage, and express all kinds of data in complex scenes and intelligently carry out fast and efficient path planning for UAVs are new challenges brought about by UAV application requirements. However, traditional path-planning methods lack the ability to effectively integrate and organize multivariate data in dynamic and complicated airspace environments. To address these challenges, this paper leverages the theory of the three-dimensional subdivision of earth space and proposes a novel environment-modeling approach based on airspace grids. In this approach, we carried out the grid-based modeling and storage of the UAV flight airspace environment and built a stable and intelligent deep-reinforcement-learning grid model to solve the problem of the passage cost of UAV path planning in the real world. Finally, we designed multiple sets of experiments to verify the efficiency of the global subdivision coding system as an environmental organization framework for path planning compared to a longitude-latitude system and to demonstrate the superiority of the improved deep-reinforcement-learning model in specific scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据