4.5 Article

Land Use and Land Cover Classification in the Northern Region of Mozambique Based on Landsat Time Series and Machine Learning

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi12080342

关键词

Google Earth Engine; deforestation; feature selection; miombo; random forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this paper was to map the land use and land cover (LULC) classes in the northern region of Mozambique between 2011 and 2020 using Landsat time series and the Random Forest classifier. The feature selection method was used to reduce redundant data. The final maps consisted of five LULC classes with an overall accuracy ranging from 80.5% to 88.7%. The study revealed changes in LULC between 2011 and 2020, including an increase in non-vegetated and built-up areas, and a decrease in open evergreen and deciduous forests and croplands. This approach improves the current systematic mapping approach in Mozambique and supports regional territorial development policies.
Accurate land use and land cover (LULC) mapping is essential for scientific and decision-making purposes. The objective of this paper was to map LULC classes in the northern region of Mozambique between 2011 and 2020 based on Landsat time series processed by the Random Forest classifier in the Google Earth Engine platform. The feature selection method was used to reduce redundant data. The final maps comprised five LULC classes (non-vegetated areas, built-up areas, croplands, open evergreen and deciduous forests, and dense vegetation) with an overall accuracy ranging from 80.5% to 88.7%. LULC change detection between 2011 and 2020 revealed that non-vegetated areas had increased by 0.7%, built-up by 2.0%, and dense vegetation by 1.3%. On the other hand, open evergreen and deciduous forests had decreased by 4.1% and croplands by 0.01%. The approach used in this paper improves the current systematic mapping approach in Mozambique by minimizing the methodological gaps and reducing the temporal amplitude, thus supporting regional territorial development policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据