4.6 Article

Comprehensive assessment of resilience of flood hazard villages using a modeling and field survey approach

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103910

关键词

Flood hazard; Machine learning model; Resilience and vulnerability; Beshar watershed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the resilience of flood-prone sub-watersheds in the Beshar basin in Iran using machine learning models. The results show that the random forest model is the most accurate and the area with very low flood risk is the largest. The resilience has decreased after 2006 compared to before.
Watersheds have been heavily affected by natural and human stresses in recent years, and their ability to recover and adapt to changed conditions depends on the resilience of the watersheds. Flood is one of these tensions, and to reduce the damages caused by it, it is necessary to identify vulnerable areas. This study aims is to evaluate the resilience of flood-prone sub-watersheds in the Beshar basin the Kohgiluyeh-Boyerahmad province of Iran. For this purpose, flood risk areas were determined using three machine learning models (MLMs), including random forest (RF), generalized linear model (GLM), and artificial neural network (ANN). Three models were evalu-ated based on criteria such as the ROC curve and Kappa coefficient, and the most accurate model was selected to identify areas at risk and complete the resilience questionnaire by residents. So-cial, economic, policy, and infrastructure criteria and 24 important and influential items were used to measure resilience. Different statistical methods were used to analyze the questionnaires and determine the resilience of different sub-basins. The results showed that the RF model (AUC = 0.96) is more accurate than the other two models. The flood risk map also showed that the very low-risk class had the largest area (2722 km2, 86% of the total study area). Also, the re-silience results showed a decrease in the mean resilience scores after 2006 compared to before 2006. The results of the spatial changes of the resilience of different sub-watersheds in these two periods showed that in the first period, 4, 9, 13, and 16 sub-watersheds are in the low resilience class and, 10 and 17 sub-watersheds are in the high resilience class. Also; after 2006, 3, 4, 9, and 21 sub-watersheds were placed in the low resilience class and 10, 13, and 14 sub-watersheds were in the high resilience class, which has had changes compared to the previous period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据