4.5 Article

Strip steel surface defect detection based on lightweight YOLOv5

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1263739

关键词

defect detection; target detection; GSConv; SimAM; loss function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a lightweight YOLOv5 strip steel surface defect detection algorithm is proposed, which achieves a good balance between detection speed and accuracy by introducing efficient lightweight convolutional layers and a non-parametric attention mechanism. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in terms of detection accuracy and speed.
Deep learning-based methods for detecting surface defects on strip steel have advanced detection capabilities, but there are still problems of target loss, false alarms, large computation, and imbalance between detection accuracy and detection speed. In order to achieve a good balance between detection accuracy and speed, a lightweight YOLOv5 strip steel surface defect detection algorithm based on YOLOv5s is proposed. Firstly, we introduce the efficient lightweight convolutional layer called GSConv. The Slim Neck, designed based on GSConv, replaces the original algorithm's neck, reducing the number of network parameters and improving detection speed. Secondly, we incorporate SimAM, a non-parametric attention mechanism, into the improved neck to enhance detection accuracy. Finally, we utilize the SIoU function as the regression prediction loss instead of the original CIoU to address the issue of slow convergence and improve efficiency. According to experimental findings, the YOLOv5-GSS algorithm outperforms the YOLOv5 method by 2.9% on the NEU-DET dataset and achieves an average accuracy (mAP) of 83.8% with a detection speed (FPS) of 100 Hz, which is 3.8 Hz quicker than the YOLOv5 algorithm. The proposed model outperforms existing approaches and is more useful, demonstrating the efficacy of the optimization strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据