4.6 Article

A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 947-987

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2

关键词

Flood susceptibility; Frequency ratio (FR); Weights-of-evidence (WofE); Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); GIS; Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flood is one of the most prevalent natural disasters that frequently occur in the northern part of Iran reported in hot spots of flood occurrences. The main aim of the current study was to prepare flood susceptibility maps using four models, namely frequency ratio (FR), weights-of-evidence (WofE), analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and ensemble of frequency ratio with AHP (FR-AHP), and to compare them at Haraz Watershed in Mazandaran Province, Iran. A total of 211 flood locations were prepared in GIS environment, of which 151 locations were randomly selected for modeling and the remaining 60 locations were used for validation aims. In the next step, 10 flood-conditioning factors were prepared including slope angle, plan curvature, elevation, topographic wetness index, stream power index, rainfall, distance from river, geology, landuse, and normalized difference vegetation index. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were created for different flood susceptibility maps. Validation of results showed that AUC values for success rate in training data set, for FR, WofE, AHP, and FR-AHP, were 97.07, 98.96, 95.91, and 86.19 % with prediction rates of 0.9657 (96.57 %), 0.9596 (95.96 %), 0.9492 (94.92 %), and 0.8469 (84.69 %), respectively. Moreover, the results showed that the frequency ratio model had the highest AUC in comparison with other models. Generally, the four models show a reasonable accuracy in flood-susceptible areas. The results of this study can be useful for managers, researchers, and planners to manage the susceptible areas to flood and reduce damages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据