4.7 Article

Polymer Additives to Go? Occurrence of the Rubber Additive 1,3-Diphenylguanidine (DPG) in Bottled Water

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 937-942

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00602

关键词

Polymer additives; 1,3-diphenylguanidine; drinkingwater; bottled water; rubber additive; human exposure; 6PPD quinone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of polymer additive DPG in bottled water samples has been comprehensively assessed and found to have a detection frequency of 40% and concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 7.4 ng/L. The impact of bottled water consumption on human exposure is estimated to be of the same magnitude as that of drinking tap water.
The occurrence of polymer additives such as 1,3diphenylguanidine (DPG) has been recently reported in different human samples, including urine and plasma. It has also been widely reported in many sources of drinking water and tap water. Here, we present the first comprehensive assessment of the occurrence of DPG in bottled water samples. A large-volume direct injection LC-MS/MS method was used for the analysis of polymer additives (DPG, DTG, and 6PPD) and six transformation products in different bottled water samples. The use of a 100 mu L direct injection LC-MS/MS method enabled detection and quantification limits as low as 0.01 and 0.05 ng/L, respectively, with no interference of potential contaminants from materials commonly used in the laboratory. Out of 63 different samples from 15 different countries, DPG had a detection frequency of 40%, with samples above the limit of quantification having a median concentration of 0.76 ng/L (maximum of 7.4 ng/L). Although the contribution to human exposure from drinking bottled water could explain little of the observed urine concentrations previously reported, the impact from bottled water consumption cannot be neglected and was estimated to be on the same order of magnitude as that of drinking tap water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据