4.6 Article

A Population Diversity-Based Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Assembly Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling with Energy Consumption

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app131910903

关键词

assembly; hybrid flow shop scheduling; energy consumption; artificial bee colony; population diversity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates an assembly hybrid flow shop scheduling problem considering energy consumption and proposes a population diversity-based artificial bee colony algorithm to minimize the makespan and total energy consumption. The algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of IGD and c metrics on over 70% of the instances tested.
Assembly shop scheduling and energy-efficient scheduling have attracted much attention in the past decades; however, energy consumption is often ignored in assembly hybrid flow shop scheduling. Neglecting energy consumption will greatly diminish the progress of sustainable manufacturing. In this study, an assembly hybrid flow shop scheduling problem considering energy consumption (EAHFSP) is investigated, and a population diversity-based artificial bee colony algorithm (DABC) is proposed to minimize the makespan and total energy consumption (TEC) simultaneously. Diversified search strategies based on rank value are introduced to the employed bee phase; a novel probability selection method in the onlooker bee phase is designed to control the selection pressure; moreover, a diversity control strategy is applied to improve the diversity of food sources and avoid falling into stagnation. A number of experiments based on 44 extended benchmark instances from the literature and a real case are conducted to test the performance of the DABC algorithm. The statistical results show that the DABC algorithm is superior to the other four state-of-the-art algorithms on over 70% of the instances corresponding to metrics IGD and c, which means that the DABC algorithm is effective and competitive in solving the considered EAHFSP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据