4.6 Article

Cyclist Injuries from Tram Track Incidents: A Retrospective 10-Year Analysis

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app132111861

关键词

traffic accidents; cyclist; cycling; tram; tram-related injuries; streetcar; fractures; injuries; accident prevention; accidental fall

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed data on cycling accidents related to tram tracks and found that bike tire wedging was the most frequent accident mechanism and upper limb fractures were the most common injury type. The implementation of certain measures resulted in a significant reduction in injuries at the main injury site.
Trams are widely used for urban public transportation. The aim of this study was to identify the total number of accidents and common injury patterns of tram-system-related cycling injuries. All patients attending the traumatology emergency department of University Hospital of Innsbruck between January 2010 and December 2019 due to tram-track-related bike crashes were identified. Patient demographics; date, time, and mechanism of the accident; type of injury; exact diagnosis and subsequent treatment; as well as direct treatment costs were evaluated and analyzed. A total of 378 patients (56.1% female; mean age: 38.4 years) were identified. Bike tire wedging was the most frequent accident mechanism (95.2%). A total of 108 patients (28.7%) sustained a total number of 135 fractures, predominately of the upper limb. Twenty-six patients (7.0%) required surgical treatment. No patient in this collective died as a result of the injuries sustained in the accident. During the time of this analysis, the city government implemented several measures to increase cyclists' safety. For the main injury site, a sharp reduction in injuries was observed. Urban tram tracks are a significant risk factor for cycling-related injuries. Injuries might be reduced with the implementation of cyclist-friendly safety measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据