4.6 Review

Hyperspectral Imaging for Fresh-Cut Fruit and Vegetable Quality Assessment: Basic Concepts and Applications

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13179740

关键词

proximal sensing; image processing; sensors; machine learning; pre- and postharvest; agri-food sector

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has been extensively studied and applied in nondestructive monitoring systems for fruit and vegetable supply chains. This review focuses on the technical aspects and data analysis approaches of HSI in fresh-cut products, exploring different applications and potential scale-up for process monitoring. Additionally, it discusses the development of cost-effective and hand-held HSI devices for process analytical technologies and the potential of proximal sensing approach based on HSI sensor networks in various fields.
During the last two decades, hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has been one of the most studied and applied techniques in the field of nondestructive monitoring systems for the fruit and vegetable supply chain. This review provides HSI technical aspects (i.e., device features) and data analysis approaches (i.e., data processing and qualitative/quantitative modeling) for fresh-cut products, focusing on the different applications which the literature offers and the possible scale-up for process monitoring. Moreover, new frontiers in the development of possible process analytical technologies of cost-effective and hand-held HSI devices are presented and discussed. Even though the performance of these new proximal sensing tools needs to be carefully evaluated, new applicative research perspectives in the development of a proximal sensing approach based on HSI sensor networks are ready to be studied and developed for finding field applications (i.e., precision agriculture, food processing, and more) and enabling faster and more convenient analysis while maintaining the accuracy and capabilities of traditional HSI systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据