4.6 Article

Spatial Distribution of Nutrient Loads Based on Mineral Fertilizers Applied to Crops: Case Study of the Lobo Basin in C & ocirc;te d'Ivoire (West Africa)

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13169437

关键词

modeling; nitrogen; phosphorus; eutrophication; SWAT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the nutrient loads in the Lobo watershed and shows that fertilizer application in the agricultural area significantly contributes to eutrophication.
Eutrophication in the Lobo watershed remains a major problem. The work carried out has focused on chemical and biological analyses in the lake or in its immediate environment: they did not sufficiently take into account the diffuse transfer of nutrients over the entire watershed. This study aims to assess the nutrient (N and P) loads in the Lobo watershed, an agricultural area, to understand the spatio-temporal impacts of land management practices on eutrophication. The methodology uses two steps: streamflow calibration and nutrient (N and P) estimation using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) watershed model. Thus, the nutrient inputs were estimated based on the levels of N and P in every kilogram of Nitrogen-phosphorus-Potassium (NPK) type fertilizers applied by farmers. The average quantities of N and P applied to the crops were 47.24 kg ha(-1) and 21.25 kg ha(-1). Results show a good performance on flow calibration as evidenced using evaluation criteria R-2, Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and Percent Bias (PBIAS) of 0.63, 0.62, and -8.1, respectively. The yields of inorganic N and soluble P varied from 0 to 0.049 kg ha(-1) and from 0 to 0.31 kg ha(-1). These results show that the crops' inorganic nitrogen requirements were higher than the demands for soluble phosphorus. Simulations relating to the organic N transfer revealed values ranging from 0.2 to 5 kg ha(-1), while the transport of organic phosphorus was estimated to vary from 0.3 to 1.3 kg ha(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据