4.8 Article

A TaSnRK1α Modulates TaPAP6L-Mediated Wheat Cold Tolerance through Regulating Endogenous Jasmonic Acid

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202303478

关键词

cold stress; common wheat; jasmonic acid; phosphorylation; TaPAP6L; TaSnRK1 alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that TaSnRK1 alpha regulates cold tolerance in wheat by phosphorylating TaPAP6L and identified key phosphorylation sites. In addition, TaPAP6L positively modulates cold tolerance by increasing jasmonic acid synthesis and suppressing degradation.
Here, a sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase alpha subunit (TaSnRK1 alpha-1A) is identified as associated with cold stress through integration of genome-wide association study, bulked segregant RNA sequencing, and virus-induced gene silencing. It is confirmed that TaSnRK1 alpha positively regulates cold tolerance by transgenes and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutants. A plastid-lipid-associated protein 6, chloroplastic-like (TaPAP6L-2B) strongly interacting with TaSnRK1 alpha-1A is screened. Molecular chaperone DJ-1 family protein (TaDJ-1-7B) possibly bridged the interaction of TaSnRK1 alpha-1A and TaPAP6L-2B. It is further revealed that TaSnRK1 alpha-1A phosphorylated TaPAP6L-2B. Subsequently, a superior haplotype TaPAP6L-2B(30S/38S) is identified and confirmed that both R30S and G38S are important phosphorylation sites that influence TaPAP6L-2B in cold tolerance. Overexpression (OE) and EMS-mutant lines verified TaPAP6L positively modulating cold tolerance. Furthermore, transcriptome sequencing revealed that TaPAP6L-2B-OE lines significantly increased jasmonic acid (JA) content, possibly by improving precursor alpha-linolenic acid contributing to JA synthesis and by repressing JAR1 degrading JA. Exogenous JA significantly improved the cold tolerance of wheat plants. In summary, TaSnRK1 alpha profoundly regulated cold stress, possibly through phosphorylating TaPAP6L to increase endogenous JA content of wheat plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据