4.6 Article

Enhance the photocatalytic activity of fluoride graphdiyne/TiO2 through introducing organic components

期刊

2D MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/acf051

关键词

graphdiyne; TiO2; photodegradation; photocatalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a controlled strategy to optimize the photocatalytic performance of hybrid catalysts by introducing organic components. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of P-FGDY/TiO2 compared to FGDY/TiO2 is attributed to the regulation of FGDY, which increases the efficiency of photogenerated electron and hole separation. This work provides a novel regulating pathway to optimize the photocatalytic activity of carbon-based hybrid photocatalysis material systems.
Structure engineering of hybrid materials has been proved to be an efficient method to screen out superior photocatalysis. The distribution and bonding environment of covalent linkage segments can be well regulated through structure decoration. Here, we propose a controlled strategy to optimize the photocatalytic performance of hybrid catalysts. Systematic adjusting of the performance can be achieved by introducing organic components into the carbon supporter. Under the guidance of this strategy, fluoride graphdiyne (FGDY) and phloroglucinol regulating FGDY (P-FGDY) is compounded with titanium dioxide (TiO2) under solvent thermal condition to obtain hybrid catalyst FGDY/TiO2 and P-FGDY/TiO2, respectively. Notably, the as-prepared P-FGDY/TiO2 exhibits superior enhancements towards photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B, methylene blue, and levofloxacin under visible-light irradiation compared with FGDY/TiO2. These enhanced photocatalytic activities stem from the fact that the regulation of FGDY could further increase the photogenerated electron and hole separation efficiency of hybrid catalyst. This work provides a novel regulating pathway to optimize the photocatalytic activity of carbon-based hybrid photocatalysis material systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据