4.6 Article

Shape-selective synthesis of para-diethylbenzene over pore-engineered ZSM-5: A kinetic study

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 396-402

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.08.007

关键词

Phosphate modification; Shape selectivity; Alkylation; Pore engineering of ZSM-5; p-Diethylbenzene; Kinetic study

资金

  1. Admar Mutt Education Foundation (AMEF), Bangalore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkylation of ethylbenzene (EB) with ethanol was carried out in a fixed bed, continuous, down-flow, tubular reactor at atmospheric pressure and hydrogen as a carrier gas in vapor phase. A detailed kinetic study was conducted over ZSM-5 zeolite extrudates pore-engineered by phosphate modification. The reaction was performed at EB: ethanol mole ratio of 4:1 and with varying contact time at temperatures of 613, 633 and 653 K. Due to the induced shape-selectivity in ZSM-5 by phosphate modification, para-diethylbenzene (PDEB) was formed as a major product and side products like benzene, meta-diethylbenzene (MDEB) and other isomers were formed in minor quantity. Langmuir-Hinselwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) method for dual site mechanism with an assumption of surface reaction controlling was applied to derive the rate equations. Activation energies for the ethylation of EB, dealkylation of EB and isomerization of PDEB were found to be 117.2, 186.0 and 298.6 kj/mol respectively. Adsorption energetics showed that EB is weakly adsorbed, whereas ethanol is strongly adsorbed over the catalyst surface. Activation energy of PDEB formation was found to be lower than that of MDEB. Considering that the alkylation takes place mostly inside the zeolite channels, the results support restricted transition state selective mechanism for EB alkylation with ethanol over phosphate modified ZSM-5. Based on the proposed kinetic model, calculated values of EB conversion and PDEB formation were found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据