4.5 Article

Effect of Thermo-Mechanical Processing on Initiation and Propagation of Stress Corrosion Cracking in 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel

期刊

METALS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met13081458

关键词

stress corrosion cracking; residual stress; austenitic stainless steel; SCC mode; microstructural evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of thermo-mechanical processing on stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in 304L stainless steel was studied. The presence of residual stress induced by welding and straightening processes, as well as strain-induced martensite transformation and slip bands formed during plastic deformation, contributed to SCC susceptibility.
Despite the high corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels (SSs), a significant reduc-tion of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance has been reported in cases of high residual stress and metastable microstructural features. In this study, the effect of thermo-mechanical processing (TMP) on the initiation and propagation of SCC in 304L SS was studied. To better understand the SCC mechanisms, three TMPs conditions-welded, solution annealed at 1050 ?C for tens of seconds, and straightened-were used. The research focused on analyzing the initial microstructure, residual stress, and hardness along the depth direction to assess SCC resistance and establish correlations with the observed SCC modes. Experimental results demonstrated that transgranular SCC was ob-served in regions exhibiting elevated residual stress induced by welding and straightening processes. Furthermore, the presence of strain-induced martensite transformation and slip bands formed during plastic deformation were identified as additional factors contributing to the susceptibility of SCC. The study findings highlighted that the magnitude and distribution of residual stresses, in conjunction with microstructural evolution, could be varied depending on the specific TMP condition, leading to different SCC susceptibilities, cracking modes, and directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据