4.7 Article

Fixed-bed CO2 adsorption onto activated char from the pyrolysis of a non-recyclable plastic mixture from real urban residues

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102517

关键词

Char; Plastic; Pyrolysis; CO2; Adsorption; Fixed-bed; ANFIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential use of activated char obtained from the pyrolysis of non-recyclable plastics for CO2 adsorption in fixed-bed columns was investigated. The plastic waste collected from a municipal solid treatment plant was pyrolyzed to produce char residue, which was then activated to create a porous carbonaceous material. Continuous column tests demonstrated successful fitting of breakthrough curves to the dose-response model. The effects of adsorption temperature, CO2 concentration, and bed length on process efficiency were evaluated using surface response methodology.
The potential use of activated char obtained from the pyrolysis of a mixture of non-recyclable plastics for the adsorption of CO2 in fixed-bed columns has been explored. The rejected fraction of plastics collected in a municipal solid treatment plant was pyrolyzed and the resulting char residue was activated to develop a porous carbonaceous material. The dynamic behavior of CO2 adsorption was assessed by the breakthrough curves ob-tained in continuous column tests. Among all the available models, the curves were successfully fitted to the dose-response model. The effect of adsorption temperature (15-45 oC), the inlet CO2 concentration (10-40 %, vol.), and the adsorbent length of the bed (loadings, 1-2 g) on the efficiency of the process was evaluated by the surface response methodology applying an adaptative neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). A temperature rise exerted a negative effect on the adsorption capacity due to the physisorption properties of the process, the fed CO2 concentration displayed a positive effect and the fixed-bed length did not play a remarkable influence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据