4.3 Article

Treatment of leishmaniasis with chemotherapy and vaccine: a mathematical model

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2023.2257746

关键词

Leishmaniasis; vaccine LEISH-F1+; MPL-SE; sodium stibugluconate; sodium antomony gluconate; meglumine antimoniate; immune response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leishmaniasis is an infectious disease with two forms: cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and visceral leishmaniasis (VL), the latter being more severe and potentially deadly. The current chemotherapy drugs for leishmaniasis have poor efficacy, toxicity, and drug resistance issues. While vaccine development is ongoing, no vaccine is currently available. However, some experimental vaccines have shown efficacy for treating CL patients.
Leishmaniasis, an infectious disease, manifests itself mostly in two forms, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and, a more severe and potentially deadly form, visceral leishmaniasis (VL). The current control strategy for leishmaniasis relies on chemotherapy drugs such as sodium antimony gluconate (SAG) and meglumine antimoniate (MA). However, all these chemotherapy compounds have poor efficacy, and they are associated with toxicity and other adverse effects, as well as drug resistance. While research in vaccine development for leishmaniasis is continuously progressing, no vaccine is currently available. However, some experimental vaccines such as LEISH-F1+MPL-SE (V) have demonstrated some efficacy when used as drugs for CL patients. In this paper we use a mathematical model to address the following question: To what extent vaccine shots can enhance the efficacy of standard chemotherapy treatment of leishmaniasis? Starting with standard MA treatment of leishmaniasis and combining it with three injections of V , we find, by Day 84, that efficacy increased from 29% to 65-91% depending on the amount of the vaccine. With two or just one injection of V , efficacy is still very high, but there is a definite resurgence of the disease by end-time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据