4.6 Article

Genomic Instability of G-Quadruplex Sequences in Escherichia coli: Roles of DinG, RecG, and RecQ Helicases

期刊

GENES
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14091720

关键词

DNA repeat; genomic instability; alternative DNA structure; replication slippage; quadruplex; mutagenesis; antigenic variation; bacterial chromatin; helicase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-quadruplex formation promotes genetic instability in bacteria, and helicases play an important role in controlling this process in vivo.
Guanine-rich DNA can fold into highly stable four-stranded DNA structures called G-quadruplexes (G4). Originally identified in sequences from telomeres and oncogene promoters, they can alter DNA metabolism. Indeed, G4-forming sequences represent obstacles for the DNA polymerase, with important consequences for cell life as they may lead to genomic instability. To understand their role in bacterial genomic instability, different G-quadruplex-forming repeats were cloned into an Escherichia coli genetic system that reports frameshifts and complete or partial deletions of the repeat when the G-tract comprises either the leading or lagging template strand during replication. These repeats formed stable G-quadruplexes in single-stranded DNA but not naturally supercoiled double-stranded DNA. Nevertheless, transcription promoted G-quadruplex formation in the resulting R-loop for (G(3)T)(4) and (G(3)T)(8) repeats. Depending on genetic background and sequence propensity for structure formation, mutation rates varied by five orders of magnitude. Furthermore, while in vitro approaches have shown that bacterial helicases can resolve G4, it is still unclear whether G4 unwinding is important in vivo. Here, we show that a mutation in recG decreased mutation rates, while deficiencies in the structure-specific helicases DinG and RecQ increased mutation rates. These results suggest that G-quadruplex formation promotes genetic instability in bacteria and that helicases play an important role in controlling this process in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据