4.6 Article

Identification and Analysis of Sex-Biased MicroRNAs in Human Diseases

期刊

GENES
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14091688

关键词

microRNA; sex-biased expression; bioinformatic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant differences between males and females in both physiology and disease necessitate the identification and analysis of sex-biased miRNAs. Previous studies have largely focused on healthy individuals or a single disease, making it necessary to comprehensively analyze sex-biased miRNAs in diseases. This study reveals that women have a greater number of highly expressed conserved miRNAs associated with a broader spectrum of diseases. Insights from this study could impact precision medicine and disease management.
It is well known that significant differences exist between males and females in both physiology and disease. Thus, it is important to identify and analyze sex-biased miRNAs. However, previous studies investigating sex differences in miRNA expression have predominantly focused on healthy individuals or restricted their analysis to a single disease. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively identify and analyze the sex-biased miRNAs in diseases. For this purpose, in this study, we first identified the miRNAs showing sex-biased expression between males and females in diseases based on a number of miRNA expression datasets. Then, we performed a bioinformatics analysis for these sex-biased miRNAs. Notably, our findings revealed that women exhibit a greater number of conserved miRNAs that are highly expressed compared to men, and these miRNAs are implicated in a broader spectrum of diseases. Additionally, we explored the enriched transcription factors, functions, and diseases associated with these sex-biased miRNAs using the miRNA set enrichment analysis tool TAM 2.0. The insights gained from this study could carry implications for endeavors such as precision medicine and possibly pave the way for more targeted and tailored approaches to disease management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据