4.6 Review

Biological Embedding of Early-Life Adversity and a Scoping Review of the Evidence for Intergenerational Epigenetic Transmission of Stress and Trauma in Humans

期刊

GENES
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14081639

关键词

intergenerational; transgenerational; epigenetics; trauma; stress; post-traumatic stress disorder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe or chronic stress and trauma can have long-lasting effects on health, possibly even persisting across generations. Epigenetics is a mechanism that has been implicated in these effects. This article provides an overview of studies demonstrating the role of DNA methylation, a widely studied epigenetic mechanism, in the effects of early-life stress, as well as the transmission of stress across generations.
Severe or chronic stress and trauma can have a detrimental impact on health. Evidence suggests that early-life adversity can become biologically embedded and has the potential to influence health outcomes decades later. Epigenetics is one mechanism that has been implicated in these long-lasting effects. Observational studies in humans indicate that the effects of stress could even persist across generations, although whether or not epigenetic mechanisms are involved remains under debate. Here, we provide an overview of studies in animals and humans that demonstrate the effects of early-life stress on DNA methylation, one of the most widely studied epigenetic mechanisms, and summarize findings from animal models demonstrating the involvement of epigenetics in the transmission of stress across generations. We then describe the results of a scoping review to determine the extent to which the terms intergenerational or transgenerational have been used in human studies investigating the transmission of trauma and stress via epigenetic mechanisms. We end with a discussion of key areas for future research to advance understanding of the role of epigenetics in the legacy effects of stress and trauma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据