4.6 Article

SLC5A1 Variants in Turkish Patients with Congenital Glucose-Galactose Malabsorption

期刊

GENES
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14071359

关键词

glucose-galactose malabsorption; SGLT1; missense mutation; transmembrane domain; glycosylation; endoplasmic reticulum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in SLC5A1 gene. Our study reports clinical and molecular data from 11 affected individuals in four unrelated Turkish families. Two novel SLC5A1 missense variants, p.Gly43Arg and p.Ala92Val, were identified in two families and linked to the disease. Our findings expand the mutational spectrum of this rare disorder.
Congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in SLC5A1 encoding the apical sodium/glucose cotransporter SGLT1. We present clinical and molecular data from eleven affected individuals with congenital glucose-galactose malabsorption from four unrelated, consanguineous Turkish families. Early recognition and timely management by eliminating glucose and galactose from the diet are fundamental for affected individuals to survive and develop normally. We identified novel SLC5A1 missense variants, p.Gly43Arg and p.Ala92Val, which were linked to disease in two families. Stable expression in CaCo-2 cells showed that the p.Ala92Val variant did not reach the plasma membrane, but was retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. The p.Gly43Arg variant, however, displayed processing and plasma membrane localization comparable to wild-type SGLT1. Glycine-43 displays nearly invariant conservation in the relevant structural family of cotransporters and exchangers, and localizes to SGLT1 transmembrane domain TM0. p.Gly43Arg represents the first disease-associated variant in TM0; however, the role of TM0 in the SGLT1 function has not been established. In summary, we are expanding the mutational spectrum of this rare disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据