4.7 Article

Treating acute exacerbations of COPD with Chinese herbal medicine to aid antibiotic use reduction (Excalibur): a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility trial

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1221905

关键词

COPD; Chinese herbal medicine; feasibility clinical trial; Shufeng Jiedu capsule; acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of the Chinese herbal medicine Shufeng Jiedu (SFJD) for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in UK primary care. The results showed that the recruitment rate was lower than expected, possibly due to the lower incidence of AECOPD during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients starting antibiotics from rescue packs before seeing their GP, and challenges in the primary care workforce. However, the study was still able to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting and randomising participants and identified approaches to address recruitment challenges.
Background: Although many acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are triggered by non-bacterial causes, they are often treated with antibiotics. Preliminary research suggests that the Chinese herbal medicine Shufeng Jiedu (SFJD), may improve recovery and therefore reduce antibiotic use in patients with AECOPD.Aims: To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of SFJD for AECOPD in UK primary care.Methods: GPs opportunistically recruited patients experiencing an AECOPD. Participants were randomised 1:1 to usual care plus SFJD or placebo for 14 days. Participants, GPs and research nurses were blinded to treatment allocation. GPs could prescribe immediate, delayed or no antibiotics, with delayed prescribing encouraged where appropriate. Participants were asked to complete a participant diary, including EXACT-PRO and CAT (TM) questionnaires for up to 4 weeks. Outcomes included recruitment rate and other measures of study feasibility described using only descriptive statistics and with no formal comparisons between groups. We also conducted qualitative interviews with recruited and non-recruited COPD patients and clinicians, analysed using framework analysis.Results: Over 6 months, 19 participants (6 SFJD, 13 placebo) were recruited. Sixteen (84%) participants returned diaries or provided a diary by recall. Overall, 1.3 participants were recruited per 1,000 patients on the COPD register per month open. Median duration of treatment was 9.8 days in the intervention group vs 13.3 days in the placebo group. The main reason for discontinuation in both groups was perceived side-effects. in both groups. Point estimates for both the EXACT-PRO and CAT (TM) outcomes suggested possible small benefits of SFJD. Most patients and clinicians were happy to try SFJD as an alternative to antibiotics for AECOPD. Recruitment was lower than expected because of the short recruitment period, the lower incidence of AECOPD during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients starting antibiotics from rescue packs before seeing their GP, and workforce challenges in primary care.Conclusion: Recruitment was impaired by the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, we were able to demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting and randomising participants and identified approaches to address recruitment challenges such as including the trial medication in COPD patients' rescue packs and delegating recruitment to a central trials team.Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier, ISRCTN26614726

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据