4.3 Article

Assessment of avian health status: suitability and constraints of the Zoetis VetScan VS2 blood analyser for ecological and evolutionary studies

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.060009

关键词

Blood physiology; Acute stress; Measurement quality; Repeatability; Eco-physiology; Veterinary sciences

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested the suitability of a portable biochemical analyser (Zoetis VetScan VS2) for ecological and evolutionary studies. The results showed that the analyser can capture biologically relevant variation in blood analytes using small blood samples, making it valuable for physiological measurements of small birds in field conditions.
Biochemical analyses of blood can decipher physiological conditions of living animals and unravel mechanistic underpinnings of life-history strategies and trade-offs. Yet, researchers in ecology and evolution often face constraints in which methods to apply, not least due to blood volume restrictions or field settings. Here, we test the suitability of a portable biochemical analyser (Zoetis VetScan VS2) for ecological and evolutionary studies that may help solve those problems. Using as little as 80 mu l of whole-bird blood from free-living Jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and captive Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata), we show that eight (out of 10) blood analytes show high repeatability after short-term storage (approximately 2 h) and six after 12 h storage time. Handling stress had a clear impact on all except two analytes by 16 min after catching. Finally, six analytes showed consistency within individuals over a period of 30 days, and three even showed individual consistency over a year. Taken together, we conclude that the VetScan VS2 captures biologically relevant variation in blood analytes using just 80 mu l of whole blood and, thus, provides valuable physiological measurements of (small) birds sampled in semi-field and field conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据