4.6 Article

Effects of different anionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 896-903

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.021

关键词

Methane hydrates; Anionic surfactants; Induction time; Contact angle; Hydrate growth

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307143]
  2. 863 Project [2011AA060905]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2013BAD22B00, 2015BAL04B02]
  4. Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program [20140015]
  5. Qingdao Science and Technology
  6. People's Livelihood Project [14-2-3-69-nsh]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the effects of anionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation were studied. For comparison, three anionic surfactants with the same carbon chain but different head groups, sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDSN), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) were used. SOBS was detected to form micelles under hydrate formation conditions, while SDSN and SDS precipitated before micelles were formed. As a result, concentrations of SDSN and SOS did not show obvious influence on the promotion effect to methane hydrate formation, while the concentration of SOBS significantly affected the promotion effect because of the micelle effect. When SDSN and SDS were used hydrates grew upwards on the reactor wall due to the relatively narrow contact angle of the surfactant solutions on the reactor sidewall, while SDBS led to the hydrates formed mainly in the bottom of the reactor as a result of the relatively wide contact angle. In addition, SDSN and SDS led to much higher growth rate in comparison to SOBS due to the upward growth of hydrates on the reactor sidewall. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据