4.5 Article

Improved Gorilla Troops Optimizer-Based Fuzzy PD-(1+PI) Controller for Frequency Regulation of Smart Grid under Symmetry and Cyber Attacks

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym15112013

关键词

gorilla troops optimizer; smart grid; frequency control; fuzzy PD-(1+PI) controller; cyber attack

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved gorilla troops optimizer (iGTO)-based fuzzy PD-(1+PI) (FPD-(1+PI)) structure is proposed for frequency control in a smart grid system. The performance of this method is demonstrated through experiments and comparisons under various operating conditions and cyberattacks.
In a smart grid (SG) system with load uncertainties and the integration of variable solar and wind energies, an effective frequency control strategy is necessary for generation and load balancing. Cyberattacks are emerging threats, and SG systems are typical cyber-attack targets. This work suggests an improved gorilla troops optimizer (iGTO)-based fuzzy PD-(1+PI) (FPD-(1+PI)) structure for the frequency control of an SG system. The SG contains a diesel engine generator (DEG), renewable sources like wind turbine generators(WTGs), solar photovoltaic (PV), and storage elements such as flywheel energy storage systems (FESSs) and battery energy storage systems (BESSs) in conjunction with electric vehicles (EVs). Initially, the dominance of the projected iGTO over the gorilla troops optimizer (GTO) and some recently suggested optimization algorithms are demonstrated by considering benchmark test functions. In the next step, a traditional PID controller is used, and the efficacy of the GTO method is compared with that of the GTO, particle swarm optimization (PSO), and genetic algorithm (GA) methods. In the next stage, the superiority of the proposed FPD-(1+PI) structure over fuzzy PID (FPID) and PID structures is demonstrated under various symmetry operating conditions as well as under different cyberattacks, leading to a denial of service (DoS) and delay in signal transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据