4.6 Article

Analysis of E-Learning System Use Using Combined TAM and ECT Factors

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151411100

关键词

acceptance model; TAM; educational sector; ECT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the acceptance and use of e-learning systems by students in Omani higher education institutions, by combining the factors of the TAM and ECT. A survey was conducted with 220 students from Al-Buraimi University College, collecting data on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention, and e-learning system use. The results showed that perceived usefulness and ease of use were significant predictors of students' intention to use e-learning systems, and behavioral intention had a direct effect on the actual use of e-learning systems. These findings provide insights for e-learning system designers, developers, and educators in Oman and similar contexts.
The use of e-learning systems has become widespread in higher education institutions in Oman. However, understanding of factors that influence student acceptance and usage of these systems is lacking. This study combined the factors of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Expectation-Confirmation Theory (ECT) to examine the acceptance and use of e-learning systems by students in Omani HEIs. A survey was conducted with 220 students from Al-Buraimi University College in Oman to collect data on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention, and e-learning system use. A model was created by merging eight interactions between TAM, ECT, and seven variables. The results showed that perceived usefulness and ease of use were significant predictors of students' intention to use e-learning systems, and behavioral intention had a direct effect on the actual use of e-learning systems. These findings provide valuable insights for e-learning system designers, developers, and educators in Oman and similar contexts to design and implement e-learning systems that meet student needs and expectations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据