4.6 Review

Resilience Assessment in Urban Water Infrastructure: A Critical Review of Approaches, Strategies and Applications

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151411151

关键词

resilience assessment; resilience strategies; urban stormwater and wastewater; urban water infrastructure; water supply systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban water infrastructure (UWI) consists of water supply systems, urban drainage/stormwater systems, and wastewater systems. This study critically reviews the approaches and strategies for resilience assessment in UWI and identifies three key areas for analysing resilience: system design, resilience concepts development, and implementation of green infrastructure. The results highlight the macroeconomic significance of UWI and suggest the need for comprehensive and sustainability-based indicators in future research.
Urban water infrastructure (UWI) comprises the main systems, including water supply systems (WSS), urban drainage/stormwater systems (UDS) and wastewater systems (WWS). The UWI needs to be resilient to a wide range of shocks and stresses, including structural failures such as pipe breakage and pump breakdown and functional failures such as unmet water demand/quality, flooding and combined sewer overflows. However, there is no general consensus about the resilience assessment of these systems widely presented by various research works. This study aims to critically review the approaches, strategies and applications of the resilience assessment for the complex systems in UWI. This review includes examining bibliometric analysis, developed frameworks related to resilience assessment to help comprehend resilience concepts for the specified UWI systems in urban settings, strategies for improving resilience, resilience indicators and common tools used for modelling resilience assessment in UWI. The results indicate that resilience assessment has primarily been conducted in developed countries, underscoring the macroeconomic significance of UWI. Three key areas have been identified for analysing resilience in UWI: system design, development of resilience concepts and implementation of green infrastructure. Moreover, it has been discovered that although resilience is commonly defined using technical approaches, a more comprehensive understanding of resilience can be gained through a holistic approach. Furthermore, while strategies such as system upgrades, decentralisation, digitalisation and nature-based solutions can enhance UWI resilience, they may be insufficient to fulfil all resilience indicators. To address the challenge of effectively comparing different resilience options, it is crucial to extensively examine comprehensive and sustainability-based indicators in future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据