4.6 Article

Behavior and Biochemical Mechanism of High Iron Attapulgite Dosages Affecting Sewage Sludge Composting

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 15, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151612527

关键词

high iron attapulgite; additive dosage effect; humification index; heavy metal bioavailability; microbial community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed the behavior and biochemical mechanism of high iron attapulgite (HIAP) and its effect on sewage sludge (SS) composting. It also examined the species distribution of heavy metals (HMs) and the changes in microbial community during HIAP-amended composting. The optimal dose of 5% HIAP was recommended for composting.
We first revealed the behavior and biochemical mechanism of high iron attapulgite (HIAP) and different dosages affecting sewage sludge (SS) composting. HS/TOC ratio increased, but HA/TOC and HA/FA ratios reduced with the increase in HIAP dose. High-dose HIAP promoted the formation of more HS by weak catalytic effect but could bind more FA than HA by strong adsorption effect to inhibit the polymerization of the adsorbed FA into HA. Mixing SS with HIAP and subsequent composting as two consecutive processes during HIAP-amended composting significantly influenced the species distribution of heavy metals (HMs) Cu, Zn, and Cr. Each process roughly contributed one-half to HMs passivation. The bioavailable fraction (BF) of HMs reduced with the increase of HIAP dose. HIAP dose greatly affected the microbial community. Both 1% and 5% HIAP treatments promoted Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, but 10% HIAP promoted Actinobacteriota and Bacteroidota. At the thermophilic phase, HIAP dose greatly affected core thermophilic microbial genera, which were significantly correlated to pile temperature and pH value. In the maturity stage, core microbial genera in different treatments were basically similar and closely correlated to the bioavailable fraction (BF) of HMs and HA, and the influence order was BF-Cr > BF-Cu > BF-Zn > HA. The optimal 5% HIAP dose was recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据