4.6 Article

Distributive mixing elements: Towards improved granule attributes from a twin screw granulation process

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 165-175

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.06.040

关键词

Continuous granulation; Particle formation; Particulate processes; Product design

资金

  1. Vertex, Lilly
  2. GSK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Granulation rate processes were studied in the distributive mixing elements (DME1) of a twin screw granulator through characterization of resulting granule attributes. The screw configuration was varied by changing the orientation (forward versus reverse) and the placement of the elements (adjacent versus spaced). A model placebo formulation composed of a-lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose and croscarmellose sodium, and an aqueous granulating liquid were used in the study. Regardless of the screw configuration. DME generated granules through breakage of large wet agglomerates from the conveying section and layering of un-granulated fines. The reverse orientation produced superior granule size distribution with improved liquid distribution attributes compared to the forward orientation. The residence time distribution and flow visualization measured by a high speed imaging camera provided the mechanistic rationale for the superior behavior of the reverse over the forward DME configurations and showed the dominant granulation rate processes therein. The asymmetrical orientation of DME on the rotating shafts significantly improved the breakage capability of the reverse-placed elements, allowing a more homogeneous flow pattern of incoming granular material, with efficient layering and liquid exchange between the lumps and un-granulated fines. The results of this study demonstrate the benefit of using DME in a twin-screw wet granulation process to optimize granule attributes for downstream processing. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据