4.2 Article

Revisiting the truncated lamin A produced by a commonly used strain of Lmna knockout mice

期刊

NUCLEUS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2023.2262308

关键词

Lamins; LMNA deficiency; lmna transcripts; nuclear envelope; nuclear lamina; protein farnesylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the truncated lamin A in Lmna (-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts is predominantly nucleoplasmic rather than at the nuclear rim, providing an explanation for the lack of farnesylation in this mutant lamin A.
The Lmna knockout mouse (Lmna -/-) created by Sullivan and coworkers in 1999 has been widely used to examine lamin A/C function. The knockout allele contains a deletion of Lmna intron 7-exon 11 sequences and was reported to be a null allele. Later, Jahn and coworkers discovered that the mutant allele produces a 54-kDa truncated lamin A and identified, by RT-PCR, a Lmna cDNA containing exon 1-7 + exon 12 sequences. Because exon 12 encodes prelamin A's CaaX motif, the mutant lamin A is assumed to be farnesylated. In the current study, we found that the truncated lamin A in Lmna( -/- )mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) was predominantly nucleoplasmic rather than at the nuclear rim, leading us to hypothesize that it was not farnesylated. Our study revealed that the most abundant Lmna transcripts in Lmna( -/-) MEFs contain exon 1-7 but not exon 12 sequences. Exon 1-7 + exon 12 transcripts were detectable by PCR but in trace amounts. We suspect that these findings explain the nucleoplasmic distribution of the truncated lamin A in Lmna( -/-) MEFs, and subsequent cell transduction experiments support this suspicion. A truncated lamin A containing exon 1-7 sequence was nucleoplasmic, whereas a lamin A containing exon 1-7 + exon 12 sequences was located along the nuclear rim. Our study explains the nucleoplasmic targeting of truncated lamin A in Lmna (-/-) MEFs and adds to our understanding of a commonly used strain of Lmna (-/- )mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据