4.8 Article

Achieving high contact-electrification charge density on inorganic materials

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108616

关键词

Contact electrification; Charge transfer; Triboelectric nanogenerator; Single crystal; Charge density

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of inorganic single crystals as a friction layer in triboelectric nanogenerator improves the charge density of inorganic materials, overcoming their previous limitation. The charge density has reached its theoretical value in both air and vacuum conditions. Furthermore, the study establishes a quantitative understanding of the charge transfer mechanism between single crystals and metal, providing theoretical guidance for the contact electrification process of inorganic materials.
Triboelectric nanogenerator has been considered as a potential choice for the booming Internet of Things as distributed energy supply unit. However, the widely used organic materials are restricted by weak aging/temperature resistance in severe conditions. In comparison, inorganic materials possess better aging/temperature resistance, but they have been overshadowed by their inferior charge density. To address this issue, inorganic single crystals have been used as a friction layer to improve the contact electrification effect of inorganic materials. This approach enhances the charge density to 170 & mu;C m- 2 and 335 & mu;C m- 2, reaching its theoretical value in air and under vacuum, respectively. Meanwhile, a quantitative understanding of the charge transfer mechanism between single crystal and metal is established, which is strongly influenced by the work function and atom species at the interface. This work provides theoretical guidance for the contact electrification process of inorganic material, and breaks its shackle of inferior charge density, greatly expanding the triboelectric series and laying a foundation for the application of triboelectric nanogenerator in extreme environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据