4.6 Article

Subthreshold Conduction of Disordered ZnO-Based Thin-Film Transistors

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi14081596

关键词

subthreshold swing; localized trap states; ZnO; thin-film transistors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of disorder on the subthreshold characteristics of atomically deposited ZnO thin-film transistors (TFTs). It is found that the charge-transport characteristics of the disordered TFTs are severely affected by localized trap states, resulting in gate-voltage-dependent degradation. By considering the disorderedness factors as gate-dependent power laws, a subthreshold current-voltage relationship is derived for disordered semiconductors. The disorderedness parameters obtained from this relationship are consistent with those obtained by the gm/Ids method.
This study presents the disorderedness effects on the subthreshold characteristics of atomically deposited ZnO thin-film transistors (TFTs). Bottom-gate ZnO TFTs show n-type enhancement-mode transfer characteristics but a gate-voltage-dependent, degradable subthreshold swing. The charge-transport characteristics of the disordered semiconductor TFTs are severely affected by the localized trap states. Thus, we posit that the disorderedness factors, which are the interface trap capacitance and the diffusion coefficient of electrons, would result in the degradation. Considering the factors as gate-dependent power laws, we derive the subthreshold current-voltage relationship for disordered semiconductors. Notably, the gate-dependent disorderedness parameters are successfully deduced and consistent with those obtained by the gm/Ids method, which was for the FinFETs. In addition, temperature-dependent current-voltage analyses reveal that the gate-dependent interface traps limit the subthreshold conduction, leading to the diffusion current. Thus, we conclude that the disorderedness factors of the ZnO films lead to the indefinable subthreshold swing of the ZnO TFTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据