4.8 Article

An ultrasensitive SERS sensor for simultaneous detection of multiple cancer-related miRNAs

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 8, 期 39, 页码 17365-17373

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr05504d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973) [2012CB933301]
  2. Sci-tech Support Plan of Jiangsu Province [BE2014719]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_15R37]
  4. Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province [SJZZ15_0107]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61302027]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20130871]
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [YX03001]
  8. National Science Foundation [CBET-1064228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous detection of multiple trace cancer associated serum miRNA biomarkers is considered as a feasible method for early cancer screening and diagnosis. In the present work, an ultrasensitive SERS sensor was prepared based on an Ag nanorod array SERS substrate by assembling special hairpin-shaped molecular beacons (MBs) for the detection of multiple lung cancer-related miRNA biomarkers. The portable SERS sensor exhibits excellent performance for the qualitative and quantitative detection of miRNAs, with advantages of ultra-sensitivity, good specificity, uniformity, reproducibility and stability, as well as remarkable reusability. By monitoring the SERS signal quenching of the MBs in the presence of target miRNA biomarkers, three lung cancer related-miRNAs (miRNA-21, miRNA-486, and miRNA-375) in buffer and human serum were simultaneously assayed using the SERS sensor array, and the limits of detection of the three miRNAs in human serum are 393 aM, 176 aM, and 144 aM, respectively. The reliable results demonstrate that the proposed SERS sensor array can be a promising candidate with great potential for the screening and clinical diagnosis of cancer in the early stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据