4.8 Article

Label-free mid-infrared photothermal live-cell imaging beyond video rate

期刊

LIGHT-SCIENCE & APPLICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41377-023-01214-2

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancement in mid-infrared (MIR) technology has led to promising biomedical applications, but MIR microscopy is limited for live biological samples due to the lack of spatial resolution and water absorption. However, the development of a wide-field MIP quantitative phase microscope with improved signal-to-noise ratio allows for live-cell imaging beyond video rate. This high-speed and high-spatial-resolution MIR microscope has great potential for live-cell analysis and can become a new tool in life science.
Advancement in mid-infrared (MIR) technology has led to promising biomedical applications of MIR spectroscopy, such as liquid biopsy or breath diagnosis. On the contrary, MIR microscopy has been rarely used for live biological samples in an aqueous environment due to the lack of spatial resolution and the large water absorption background. Recently, mid-infrared photothermal (MIP) imaging has proven to be applicable to 2D and 3D single-cell imaging with high spatial resolution inherited from visible light. However, the maximum measurement rate has been limited to several frames s(-1), limiting its range of use. Here, we develop a significantly improved wide-field MIP quantitative phase microscope with two orders-of-magnitude higher signal-to-noise ratio than previous MIP imaging techniques and demonstrate live-cell imaging beyond video rate. We first derive optimal system design by numerically simulating thermal conduction following the photothermal effect. Then, we develop the designed system with a homemade nanosecond MIR optical parametric oscillator and a high full-well-capacity image sensor. Our high-speed and high-spatial-resolution MIR microscope has great potential to become a new tool for life science, in particular for live-cell analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据