4.7 Review

Nanomedicine-based adjuvant therapy: a promising solution for lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-01958-4

关键词

Nanomedicine; Lung cancer; Adjuvant therapy; Theranostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, but the prognosis for many patients remains poor. Nanomedicine-based adjuvant therapies have emerged as promising approaches to enhance conventional treatments and protect against adverse effects. These therapies have been extensively studied in preclinical and clinical cancer treatments to improve therapeutic outcomes and overcome the limitations of traditional therapies.
Lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide for decades. Despite the increasing understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms, the prognosis still remains poor for many patients. Novel adjuvant therapies have emerged as a promising treatment method to augment conventional methods and boost the therapeutic effects of primary therapies. Adjuvant therapy based on nanomedicine has gained considerable interest for supporting and enhancing traditional therapies, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, due to the tunable physicochemical features and ease of synthetic design of nanomaterials. In addition, nanomedicine can provide protective effects against other therapies by reducing adverse side effects through precise disease targeting. Therefore, nanomedicine-based adjuvant therapies have been extensively employed in a wide range of preclinical and clinical cancer treatments to overcome the drawbacks of conventional therapies. In this review, we mainly discuss the recent advances in adjuvant nanomedicine for lung cancer treatment and highlight their functions in improving the therapeutic outcome of other therapies, which may inspire new ideas for advanced lung cancer therapies and stimulate research efforts around this topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据