4.4 Article

Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)040

关键词

Hadron-Hadron Scattering; Higgs Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections for the Higgs boson production in the H -> ZZ -> 4l ( l = e, mu) decay channel are presented. The results are in agreement with the standard model expectation. Differential cross sections measured as a function of several kinematic observables provide a comprehensive characterization of the four leptons final state. Constraints on the Higgs boson trilinear coupling and on the bottom and charm quark coupling modifiers are derived from its transverse momentum distribution. All results are consistent with theoretical predictions from the standard model.
Measurements of the inclusive and differential fiducial cross sections for the Higgs boson production in the H -> ZZ -> 4 l ( l = e, mu) decay channel are presented. The results are obtained from the analysis of proton-proton collision data recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb(-1). The measured inclusive fiducial cross section is 2.73 +/- 0.26 fb, in agreement with the standard model expectation of 2.86 +/- 0.1 fb. Differential cross sections are measured as a function of several kinematic observables sensitive to the Higgs boson production and decay to four leptons. A set of double-differential measurements is also performed, yielding a comprehensive characterization of the four leptons final state. Constraints on the Higgs boson trilinear coupling and on the bottom and charm quark coupling modifiers are derived from its transverse momentum distribution. All results are consistent with theoretical predictions from the standard model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据