4.4 Article

Search for t(t)over-barH/A → t(t)over-bart(t)over-bar production in the multilepton final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)203

关键词

Beyond Standard Model; Hadron-Hadron Scattering; Top Physics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A search for a new heavy scalar or pseudo-scalar Higgs boson produced in association with a pair of top quarks and its decay behavior was conducted. The results showed no significant discrepancy from the Standard Model expectation, providing valuable insights into the properties of Higgs boson and potential physics beyond the Standard Model.
A search for a new heavy scalar or pseudo-scalar Higgs boson (H/A) produced in association with a pair of top quarks, with the Higgs boson decaying into a pair of top quarks (H/A -> t (t) over bar) is reported. The search targets a final state with exactly two leptons with same-sign electric charges or at least three leptons. The analysed dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb(-1) of proton-proton collisions collected at a centre-of-mass energy of 13TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Two multivariate classifiers are used to separate the signal from the background. No significant excess of events over the Standard Model expectation is observed. The results are interpreted in the context of a type-II two-Higgs-doublet model. The observed (expected) upper limits at 95% confidence level on the t (t) over barH/A production cross-section times the branching ratio of H/A -> t (t) over bar range between 14 (10) fb and 6 (5) fb for a heavy Higgs boson with mass between 400 GeV and 1000 GeV, respectively. Assuming that only one particle, either the scalar H or the pseudo-scalar A, contributes to the t (t) over bart (t) over bar final state, values of tan beta below 1.2 or 0.5 are excluded for a mass of 400 GeV or 1000 GeV, respectively. These exclusion ranges increase to tan beta below 1.6 or 0.6 when both particles are considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据