4.4 Article

Effective approach to the Antoniadis-Mottola model: quantum decoupling of the higher derivative terms

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2023)097

关键词

Models of Quantum Gravity; Effective Field Theories; Renormalization and Regularization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the decoupling issue of the massive ghost mode in the 4D theory of the conformal factor of the metric. It analyzes the asymptotic behavior of the derived one-loop nonlocal form factors in the UV and IR limits. The results reproduce the Minimal Subtraction scheme-based beta functions in the UV domain and show that the structures contributing to the running of parameters in the IR are correlated with the divergent part from the effective low-energy theory of the conformal factor.
We explore the decoupling of massive ghost mode in the 4D (four-dimensional) theory of the conformal factor of the metric. The model was introduced by Antoniadis and Mottola in [1] and can be regarded as a close analog of the fourth-derivative quantum gravity. The analysis of the derived one-loop nonlocal form factors includes their asymptotic behavior in the UV and IR limits. In the UV (high energy) domain, our results reproduce the Minimal Subtraction scheme-based beta functions of [1]. In the IR (i.e., at low energies), the diagrams with massive ghost internal lines collapse into tadpole-type graphs without nonlocal contributions and become irrelevant. On the other hand, those structures that contribute to the running of parameters of the action and survive in the IR, are well-correlated with the divergent part (or the leading in UV contributions to the form factors), coming from the effective low-energy theory of the conformal factor. This effective theory describes only the light propagating mode. Finally, we discuss whether these results may shed light on the possible running of the cosmological constant at low energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据