4.8 Article

Efficient, flexible and mechanically robust perovskite solar cells on inverted nanocone plastic substrates

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 4276-4283

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr08836d

关键词

-

资金

  1. General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grant Council [612113]
  2. Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund from the Innovation and Technology Commission [ITS/117/13, ITS/362/14FP]
  3. State Key Laboratory on Advanced Displays and Optoelectronics at HKUST
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51422206, 51372159]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilization of nanostructures on photovoltaic devices can significantly improve the device energy conversion efficiency by enhancing the device light harvesting capability as well as carrier collection efficiency. However, improvements in device mechanical robustness and reliability, particularly for flexible devices, have rarely been reported with in-depth understanding. In this work, we fabricated efficient, flexible and mechanically robust organometallic perovskite solar cells on plastic substrates with inverted nano-cone (i-cone) structures. Compared with the reference cell that was fabricated on a flat substrate, it was shown that the device power conversion efficiency could be improved by 37%, and reached up to 11.29% on i-cone substrates. More interestingly, it was discovered that the performance of an i-cone device remained more than 90% of the initial value even after 200 mechanical bending cycles, which is remarkably better than for the flat reference device, which degraded down to only 60% in the same test. Our experiments, coupled with mechanical simulation, demonstrated that a nanostructured template can greatly help in relaxing stress and strain upon device bending, which suppresses crack nucleation in different layers of a perovskite solar cell. This essentially leads to much improved device reliability and robustness and will have significant impact on practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据