4.7 Article

An oligosaccharyltransferase from Leishmania donovani increases the N-glycan occupancy on plant-produced IgG1

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1233666

关键词

antibody; glycoprotein; glycosylation; Nicotiana benthamiana; recombinant protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By testing a single-subunit oligosaccharyltransferase from Leishmania donovani (LdOST), we found that it can significantly increase the Fc glycosylation level of IgG1 without changing the overall N-glycan composition. This finding is important for reducing the heterogeneity of plant-produced antibodies and improving their stability and effector functions.
N-Glycosylation of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) at the heavy chain Fc domain (Asn297) plays an important role for antibody structure and effector functions. While numerous recombinant IgG1 antibodies have been successfully expressed in plants, they frequently display a considerable amount (up to 50%) of unglycosylated Fc domain. To overcome this limitation, we tested a single-subunit oligosaccharyltransferase from the protozoan Leishmania donovani (LdOST) for its ability to improve IgG1 Fc glycosylation. LdOST fused to a fluorescent protein was transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana and confocal microscopy confirmed the subcellular location at the endoplasmic reticulum. Transient co-expression of LdOST with two different IgG1 antibodies resulted in a significant increase (up to 97%) of Fc glycosylation while leaving the overall N-glycan composition unmodified, as determined by different mass spectrometry approaches. While biochemical and functional features of glycosylation improved antibodies remained unchanged, a slight increase in Fc & gamma;RIIIa binding and thermal stability was observed. Collectively, our results reveal that LdOST expression is suitable to reduce the heterogeneity of plant-produced antibodies and can contribute to improving their stability and effector functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据