4.6 Article

Soil salinity is the main factor influencing the soil bacterial community assembly process under long-term drip irrigation in Xinjiang, China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1291962

关键词

long-term drip irrigation; saline-alkali soil; bacterial community; null model; assembly processes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effects of the length of time that drip irrigation (DI) lasts on soil bacterial diversity and community assembly process. The results showed that long-term DI reduced soil salinity and increased soil bacterial diversity, while also affecting the bacterial community structure. Soil salinity was found to be the primary factor influencing the bacterial community assembly process.
Identifying the potential factors associated with the impact of long-term drip irrigation (DI) on soil ecosystems is essential for responding to the environmental changes induced by extensive application of DI technology in arid regions. Herein, we examined the effects of the length of time that DI lasts in years (NDI) on soil bacterial diversity as well as the soil bacterial community assembly process and the factors influencing it. The results showed that long-term DI substantially reduced soil salinity and increased soil bacterial diversity while affecting the soil bacterial community structure distinctly. Null model results showed that the soil bacterial community assembly transitioned from stochastic processes to deterministic processes, as NDI increased. Homogeneous selection, a deterministic process, emerged as the dominant process when NDI exceeded 15 years. Both random forest and structural equation models showed that soil salinity was the primary factor affecting the bacterial community assembly process. In summary, this study suggested that soil bacteria respond differently to long-term DI and depends on the NDI, influencing the soil bacterial community assembly process under long-term DI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据